While it's fascinating to learn that there can be such anatomical variation in penile structure, we cannot really say that it has any relationship to PE potential. Unfortunately, it required post mortem dissection to discover the tunica construction variation among individuals, at which point it's a bit late to be concerned with PE. What we need is a way to determine the tunica variant among living volunteers willing to enter into a strictly controlled PE trial, after which we'd learn whether or not gains are dependent upon tunica style. Until then it's nothing but speculation, which is fun, but still just speculation. Consider, too, that the original sample size was small. Would the percentages change significantly with a larger sample? Are there any correlations between race and tunica variant? Was there any relationship between adult natural penis size and tunica type? It would be great if the medical community took an interest in this aspect of male anatomical variation. |