Thanks for the rep CJ

Thanks for the rep CJ

Thanks, in that case you should post some fun ones in there

Thanks for the rep CJ

Thanks for the rep CJ

I fully agree, and its something I plan to keep in mind, but whether I consciously care about the average stats or not, I know them and thus my personal beliefs and ideal goals are somewhat based on those. For that reason, I doubt I will use his method of measuring to dictate my goals. If I did, I would be worried I would be overdoing my PE a bit More and more, I find myself viewing PE as a means to improve my sexual health, and not for growth, even if gains in girth would be a bit nice. Its odd, since I have yet to really gain anything. Just being on this site has given me tonnes of perspective. Its sad so many members only see the negative side of things, but I hope this site can help them in the same way it helped me

Definitely, the way we measure is probably correct But I personally prefer Stan's method of measuring BPEL with the ruler perpendicular to the penis, the ruler on it's side as opposed to laying flat on top of the penis, as it prevents you from pressing the ruler too far into the fat-pad and "digging" under the curve of the pubic bone.

I really didn't read the material due to lots of homework. Looking back at it now, it all is surprisingly unclear. I am positive the BPEL way we use is the most commonly accepted way, medically speaking, but whether that means anything or matters, god knows and who really cares

Thanks for the rep CJ The first two links were strange, they both came from Kinsey, but they gave different accounts of "standard" measuring technique, seems even the experts are confused!

Thanks bud Glad you liked my rationale