Go Back   The PE Gym Forums > Main PE Forums > PE Devices

PE Devices Hanging, Clamping, Pumping, and alike discussion and help.

You are not logged in. Either log-in or register to post, to ask questions, and for other extras.

Rate This Thread - Base Girth.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-19-2007, 11:22 AM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
beavertaffy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 442
Rep Power: 8 beavertaffy is on a distinguished road
Default

dustpan,
how's the base girth been coming? is that baseball bat effect going away?
beavertaffy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2007, 05:19 PM   #12 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Dustpan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Up State, New York
Posts: 786
Rep Power: 13 Dustpan is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Dustpan Send a message via MSN to Dustpan Send a message via Yahoo to Dustpan
Default

Beavertaffy
I have have stoped the baseball effect and now I have the same size just about through out the whole shaft. At the base when erect it is 6.00" and at mid shaft its 6.062", at the gland it is 6.125".
__________________
Starting stats 7/15/05 -FL 3.750"x FG 2.125", BPEL 5.250"xEG 3.750"
Current Stats: 11/04/07-FL 6.062"x FG 5.687,( BPEL 8.000"x EG 6.125")
Goal for 2008 BPEL 8.500" x EG 6.125"

Dusty
Dustpan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2007, 09:53 AM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
beavertaffy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 442
Rep Power: 8 beavertaffy is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dustpan View Post
Beavertaffy
I have have stoped the baseball effect and now I have the same size just about through out the whole shaft. At the base when erect it is 6.00" and at mid shaft its 6.062", at the gland it is 6.125".
Dust,

That's awesome to hear. Do you attribute it mostly to this exercise?
beavertaffy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 01:46 PM   #14 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 0 ster.john.smith is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Baseball Bat Effect

Dustpan, was the baseball bat effect a product of jelqing?

For anyone:

I don't understand why more people are not concerned over the prospect of developing the baseball bat shape. It bothers me greatly, and as I PMed Remek earlier, I wish to avoid it like the plague.

It seems to me that jelqing at a 100 percent or just below might be a way to go to negate the baseballbat effect. I know DoubleLongDaddy of mattersofsize.com jelqed at 100 percent. What exactly are the dangers supposed to be?
ster.john.smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2007, 10:03 PM   #15 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Dustpan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Up State, New York
Posts: 786
Rep Power: 13 Dustpan is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Dustpan Send a message via MSN to Dustpan Send a message via Yahoo to Dustpan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ster.john.smith View Post
Dustpan, was the baseball bat effect a product of jelqing?

For anyone:

I don't understand why more people are not concerned over the prospect of developing the baseball bat shape. It bothers me greatly, and as I PMed Remek earlier, I wish to avoid it like the plague.

It seems to me that jelqing at a 100 percent or just below might be a way to go to negate the baseballbat effect. I know DoubleLongDaddy of mattersofsize.com jelqed at 100 percent. What exactly are the dangers supposed to be?
[b]

ster.john.smith

I think that this was do to Jelqing at or under 50% erection, so I am inclined to believe that Jelqing at 100% erection is the correct way to Jelq

BTW, I have stopped the baseball bat effect with this exercise.
__________________
Starting stats 7/15/05 -FL 3.750"x FG 2.125", BPEL 5.250"xEG 3.750"
Current Stats: 11/04/07-FL 6.062"x FG 5.687,( BPEL 8.000"x EG 6.125")
Goal for 2008 BPEL 8.500" x EG 6.125"

Dusty

Last edited by Dustpan : 08-24-2007 at 10:09 PM.
Dustpan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2007, 01:58 PM   #16 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 0 ster.john.smith is an unknown quantity at this point
Default none

Thank you, Dusty

Yeah, the 100 percent jelqing definitely makes better sense to me.

Also, I have PMed you with more specific questions about your hanger. There are a lot of them so please bear with me. I tried to make the list comprehensive so I wouldn't have to bother you repeatedly, but I know I may indeed have more in the future.

Cheers, Dustpan.
ster.john.smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2007 PE resolution beavertaffy Progress Log 257 12-31-2007 03:46 AM
girth is more importen t than Lenght? mike steve General PE 6 08-03-2007 01:10 PM
focusing on girth, does this sound good? beavertaffy PE Devices 6 02-15-2007 01:34 AM
New guy wants to Improving girth Coinguy General PE 10 10-17-2006 08:48 PM
Gaining girth using IPR protocol quik4life General PE 5 09-25-2006 07:04 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:05 PM.

  
 xml feed

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.