penis size versus body part size correlation=not true!

[ironion]

I have read in several threads about the correlation between the size of ones penis and the size of hands, feet, etc.and thought i would post my opinion. So here it is: it's all untrue! The size of most body parts is determined by bone growth/development while penis size is determined by tissue growth. I have no scientific evidence it just makes sense to me...We might as well all believe that tongue size is related to hair length!

[Batwoman]

I totally agree. Those supposed correlations are just myths.

[Pegasus]

My understanding is the only correlation, a weak one ,is to total body size/height.

[Danger]

I agree i think that the only true (if one) correlation between size and body would be the height of a person, because its only natural that the body would keep itself in proportion.

[redbear52]

Actually, there have been surveys that have shown a correlation between body size and penis size, but as Pegasus said the correlation coefficient was small which means that knowing a guy's height has very little predictive value in estimating his penis size.

Still, if you could assemble and measure a large random group of guys who were 6 1/2 feet tall and another group of guys 5 1/2 feet tall, the average penis length for the tall guy group would be a little greater than that for the shorter guys (as would hand size, foot size, etc).

[going411by7]

My 14 size feet have nothing to do with my endowment.

[Pirate]

My 14 size feet have nothing to do with my endowment.

Is it true that you jelq your toes?

[going411by7]

My second toe is longer than my big toe. It has a nasty curve which I have thought about jelqing to correct.

[NP97]

My understanding is the only correlation, a weak one ,is to total body size/height.

I got a big friend (not fat, but big) and he be tiny. If I weren't fat I'd be tiny (with me being kinda short) but was above average pre-pe. There is nothing from ones outward appearance that would determine ones penis size.

[ironion]

While I obviously don't agree with the hands, feet, finger, and other "bony structure" correlations, I would be willing to accept that there may be a relation to total body size(but not necessarily height in specific)however weak it might be. The reason this seems plausible is because the growth of an individual is regulated by the pituitary gland in the brain. Total body growth most definitely is connected to pituitary regulation and penis size probably has a large connection with this gland too, but testosterone level is also in the mix when it comes to man parts. I would bet that the correlaton pegasus and redbear52 are talking about refers less to bone growth ( thus one's height) and more to the muscle/ other tissue development.

So I guess it goes along with my original post to say that men who are naturally more meaty, and therefore possess greater body size, would have a higher penis size average.

I think that makes sense? Disclaimer: I am NOT qualified to make any definite statements. I am merely offering my own understanding on the matter, which is meager and not very reliable.