Size Matters

[Trotsky slaying thedragon]

I'd like to link to an article by Rollo Tomassi on the blog Rational Male. In this post, "Size Matters" he essentially confirms the viewpoint understood by all men and dismissed by women - that Size matters because it's added genetic/status value to a mate. Women who need provisions (IE a stable good guy father) originally wanted to keep the discussion on genetic value of a mate hush-hush between them and their friends. By opening up and declaring point blank that size matters they would disqualify potential beta male providers on that basis. However, since the turn of this current century and the general feminization of society provisioning has become safer and easier to attain for women thus declaring unequivocally their preference for hot bods and big dicks isn't a problem because they can provide for themselves or the government will provide for them.

Women's liberation (feminism, all women's social movements in history) have been attempts at extracting value from men to increase the interests of women. Now that work is safe, food is plentiful, and peace has been achieved women can revert away from the beta model (nice guy, father figure, hard worker) into pure genetic lust (alpha overman).

So when you hear a woman say that "size doesn't matter" it's actually an echo from a culture or mood that wants a provider over a genetic alpha. IN the current culture which worships women (fat women are beautiful too!) and provides for them societally this echo is largely fading out to more openly selfish women who are also encouraged by society.

THe link is here and it's not commercial: Size Matters «

[donjelqer76]

This is a load of garbage. Any article that generalizes any group ("women" in this case) will always be wrong. We are all individuals, regardless of gender, race or age. No matter the subject, there will always be those that reflect the subject, those that don't, and everything in between. Surely it doesn't take a rocket scientist to know this

[Trotsky slaying thedragon]

This is a load of garbage. Any article that generalizes any group ("women" in this case) will always be wrong. We are all individuals, regardless of gender, race or age. No matter the subject, there will always be those that reflect the subject, those that don't, and everything in between. Surely it doesn't take a rocket scientist to know this

The whole of social science was to identify trends within groups and populations. I could easily retort to you saying that "no man is an island" and we all share certain characteristics and beliefs that produce different results in the field of life.

What he's getting at is that there is a general feminization narrative that drives our culture. We are a female first culture for a variety of reasons. He wanted to show how some women could respond in a variety of contexts in order to better inform men about the nature of women. His blog is about showing men how to better their lives, whereas fem-centric narrative is about how to impoverish and eliminate. By showing the double-sided nature employed by some women we can come to a better conclusion about how females generally operate so in the sexual marketplace we can do better ourselves.

[donjelqer76]

I understand that. Hell, I would even agree if someone could show me such a scientific trend, but it doesn't exist. That article is nothing more than the opinion of one man.

[Trotsky slaying thedragon]

Well I sure did write a post that is now completely gone.

It is the opinion of one man but it's informed. Anecdotes, experiences, and general feelings that fit together logically and make a persuasive case have value. Social trends and opinions based on logical conclusions are valuable.

[MikeShlort]

This is absolute rubbish! None of this is true at all, all women really want is to be cuddled and have the guy they had a crush on when they were 13 to marry them and live happily every after!

Oh, hold on a sec.... I know I'm retarded. But not that retarded.

Good post. That pretty much sums it all up. Women can have anything they want, so they take it. That's why losers like me sit and try not to jerk off! So many other social ladder climbers with nicer bodies, better jobs and bigger dicks, no need for a woman with options to settle with a guy like me. That's why you see good looking guys with fat chicks. Clearly there are better looking guys with more money and penis available, so unfortunately, no desirable girls for buddy!

It really pays to be a douche bag. Get yourself some tattoos, big sunglasses, get your haircut by someone with Downs Syndrome, wear a muscle shirt and act like you aren't just another turd emulating what you see on TV and you'll have the sexiest of the whores at your feet!

[MikeShlort]

Also, at what point is a man not a beta male? Once he is anything over 7.9x5.9?

[Steve23]

Oh look more insecure pointless stuff. Trotsky, you need to work out your insecurites and problems instead of seaching for stuff that destorys your confidence even more than it is now.


Oh, and if you want to bring up alpha and beta male talk, please don't mention penis size because alpha and beta has nothing to do with the size of your penis, but believe what you want.

[BigO]

Wow, I must be a well hung beta male according to all of this.

[Trotsky slaying thedragon]

Also, at what point is a man not a beta male? Once he is anything over 7.9x5.9?

Not quite the case. An alpha male with a small dick could conceivably be outfucked by a beta male with a big dick. An Alpha Male with a big dick = maximum sexual opportunity. Alpha traits tend to correlate with big-dickishness while small penised dudes are generally beta. This isn't a wash, though.

Getting a big dick solves a lot of problems. Getting money solves a lot of problems. Acting like an alpha solves a lot of problems. Combining them produces the maximum result.

The knock against "alpha" males by wimmin folk is precisely that it is actually a mask not highlighting their genetic opportunity. The reason why a woman will clamor for a beta male is that the beta male possesses a high value trait and doesn't stray. Average looking women who secure good looking and well dicked beta males are actually pursuing a successful strategy.

Let me put it this way: men have a "value" bar by which they are considered men. A dude with a 2 inch cock who is ridiculously alpha in all facets in life may be able to fill up the bar to where he is considered high value, but it's going to be a lot tougher for him than it would be with a guy with an appropriate 7 to 8 inch cock.

It's like an RPG; you have stats in stamina, intelligence, charisma, strength, beauty, and size (height and penis girth/length) and these constitute whether you are an alpha (good), beta (neutral/bad), or omega (should've been aborted).

A big dick /= automatic alpha

But a big dick DOES mean that you aren't omega (since you have SOMETHING of value).