Proof of god

[Jackxxx]

"IF IT COULD BE DEMONSTRATED THAT ANY COMPLEX ORGAN EXISTED WHICH COULD NOT POSSIBLY HAVE BEEN FORMED BY NUMEROUS, SUCCESSIVE SLIGHT MODIFICATIONS MY THEORY WOULD ABSOLUTELY BREAKDOWN

- Charles Darwin.

[Jackxxx]

[Jackxxx]

[Marlon LGHanger]

Nobody see's themselves as primates, that's childish, if you still don't get it then fine, but it's like me saying you guys see yourselves as god's bitches.

I hesitate to suggest another book to read... but this one is an easy read, you can do it in a couple hours. It's written by a NASA scientist - Scott Huse. It's called "The Collapse of Evolution". He has an entire chapter dedicated to the all the fragmented skeletal remains that evolutionists like to point to as evidence of primate evolution. How scientists build an entire primate skeleton from the jaw bone of a pig! Ooops don't tell those 6th grade libtard teachers in our pubic screwl system that teach evolution as fact.

[Wolfemother]

There are many versions of the “turtle” story. Here is one of the best known:

“William James, father of American psychology, tells of meeting an old lady who told him the Earth rested on the back of a huge turtle. "But, my dear lady", Professor James asked, as politely as possible, "what holds up the turtle?" "Ah", she said, "that's easy. He is standing on the back of another turtle." "Oh, I see", said Professor James, still being polite. "But would you be so good as to tell me what holds up the second turtle?" "It's no use, Professor", said the old lady, realizing he was trying to lead her into a logical trap. "It's turtles-turtles-turtles, all the way!”



— from Wilson, R.A. (1983, 1997) Prometheus Rising. Phoenix, AZ: New Falcon Publishers, 1983.

[Jackxxx]

There are many versions of the “turtle” story. Here is one of the best known:

“William James, father of American psychology, tells of meeting an old lady who told him the Earth rested on the back of a huge turtle. "But, my dear lady", Professor James asked, as politely as possible, "what holds up the turtle?" "Ah", she said, "that's easy. He is standing on the back of another turtle." "Oh, I see", said Professor James, still being polite. "But would you be so good as to tell me what holds up the second turtle?" "It's no use, Professor", said the old lady, realizing he was trying to lead her into a logical trap. "It's turtles-turtles-turtles, all the way!”



— from Wilson, R.A. (1983, 1997) Prometheus Rising. Phoenix, AZ: New Falcon Publishers, 1983.

reminds me of the missing link theory. "don't worry, we haven't found it but we will some day"

[Jackxxx]

[Dontrike]

"IF IT COULD BE DEMONSTRATED THAT ANY COMPLEX ORGAN EXISTED WHICH COULD NOT POSSIBLY HAVE BEEN FORMED BY NUMEROUS, SUCCESSIVE SLIGHT MODIFICATIONS MY THEORY WOULD ABSOLUTELY BREAKDOWN

- Charles Darwin.

Yes, Darwin knew that there was a chance that he could be wrong, any smart person way back when knew that they didn't know everything. Too bad those with God usually don't think there is a chance that God doesn't exist. Difference with the evolution theory, right or wrong, is that at least they look like they have much more evidence than the God theory, and for many that is all they need.

[Jackxxx]

Yes, Darwin knew that there was a chance that he could be wrong, any smart person way back when knew that they didn't know everything. Too bad those with God usually don't think there is a chance that God doesn't exist. Difference with the evolution theory, right or wrong, is that at least they look like they have much more evidence than the God theory, and for many that is all they need.

Well, if that is all they need tells me they are ignorant. How can you "believe" in a theory as a fact just with a few evidence that is completely refutable as evidence.

The evolution of human is already proven wrong. What is the alternative now?

[Dontrike]

Well, if that is all they need tells me they are ignorant. How can you "believe" in a theory as a fact just with a few evidence that is completely refutable as evidence.

The evolution of human is already proven wrong. What is the alternative now?

How can you "believe" in a deity with even less evidence than the theory you think you shouldn't believe in? If there is faith with God or some other omniscient source then why is faith in science and its theories so hard to believe?