Proof of god

[Jackxxx]

And who told you that I "believe" in a deity? go back and read the previous posts. I do not "Believe". I know or do not know. I do not have faith. That is ignorance. I know what ancient civilizations wrote in their own libraries of science, philosophy and knowledge.

I assume you had a great-grandfather. You are proud of your heritage. Who the FUCK am I to come with a stupid paper title as a clown, to claim with so much validity that your great-grandfather never existed??? I can perfectly claim that he was a myth. You are lying. You are delusional. I AM right,m because I am a "scientist" and this is 2015 so my knowledge and technology is valid, NOT your family knowledge and technology. I have to complete truth, and my books will preach that your great-grandfather was a myth. Never existed. And my word will be accepted as fact.

You see the picture?

[longerlastingnoob]

Yes, Darwin knew that there was a chance that he could be wrong, any smart person way back when knew that they didn't know everything. Too bad those with God usually don't think there is a chance that God doesn't exist. Difference with the evolution theory, right or wrong, is that at least they look like they have much more evidence than the God theory, and for many that is all they need.

That's a big difference between the two. People posting books to read, referencing articles, posting videos, conspiracy claims. All one side, all looking for cracks in the framework so as to gather further support for their beliefs, saying one is proven wrong and one they either know or don't know.

I'm not going to keep posting snippets from here and there from various sources, I'm not going to give accounts of different people throughout history who opposed religion, the information is there, both for and against, for both sides, and it's not known but it is clear where the developments have been made and which we are getting closer to finding.

I saw " blinded by media and the elites" somewhere on this thread, I think many have been blinded, it's clear to see who from this thread.

[longerlastingnoob]

I know what ancient civilizations wrote in their own libraries of science, philosophy and knowledge.

You are lying. You are delusional. I AM right,m because I am a "scientist". And my word will be accepted as fact.?

You have to see the problem here.

[Jackxxx]

You have to see the problem here.

Oh so copying and pasting different words in a sentence to change a context is your last resort? Thank you for proving my point.

I asked before and I ask again then. Since the evolution of humans is officially proven wrong. What is the next alternative for the religion of "science"?

[upsize-me]

Logically speaking it takes far more faith to believe in that theory than it does to believe in a divine designer or creator.

Logically speaking it takes far more faith to believe in a divine designer or creator than it does to believe in evolution.

Both these statements are equally meaningless unless we can agree on a unit of measurement for an amount of faith required to believe in something, which we can't. Claiming an opinion to be a logical statement does not make it so.

To be an evolutionary change, it wold take millions of years to transition that much from one species to another.

Agreed, there have been millions of years worth of evolution leading up to the present day. However, I'm not sure how you arrived at the length of time required for a species to evolve away their penis bone.

I do not "Believe". I know or do not know. I do not have faith. That is ignorance.

Agreed again. Claiming to "know" things to be true when they are actually an opinion or belief is indeed ignorance.

Since the evolution of humans is officially proven wrong.

Another great example of why this thread has nowhere to go.

[longerlastingnoob]

Oh so copying and pasting different words in a sentence to change a context is your last resort? Thank you for proving my point.

I asked before and I ask again then. Since the evolution of humans is officially proven wrong. What is the next alternative for the religion of "science"?

Didn't change anything.

[Jackxxx]

Logically speaking it takes far more faith to believe in a divine designer or creator than it does to believe in evolution.

Both these statements are equally meaningless unless we can agree on a unit of measurement for an amount of faith required to believe in something, which we can't. Claiming an opinion to be a logical statement does not make it so.



Agreed, there have been millions of years worth of evolution leading up to the present day. However, I'm not sure how you arrived at the length of time required for a species to evolve away their penis bone.



Agreed again. Claiming to "know" things to be true when they are actually an opinion or belief is indeed ignorance.



Another great example of why this thread has nowhere to go.

Of course is going nowhere to go. Because people who drink the coolaid and "believe" in what another human said, are like telling somebody to to the other side of the wall. And the person stop in front of the wall. And you tell them hey, go around the wall. And the person hits his head in the wall. And you're again hey, it is possible to go around the wall, you just gotta turn right or left and go around. Ad the person sleep slamming his head against the wall. Thats the sheep behavior we see of course first in "scientists" and then anybody who follows them exactly like if they were priests. "scientists" HAVE to be right because they are "scientists" and they say so.

No common sense, logic, nothing.

[longerlastingnoob]

Jackxxx, that was a good one, you should be posting it in the laugh for the forum though.

[Jackxxx]

Im sorry for the spelling. My macbook makes mistakes all the time.

[longerlastingnoob]

I'm not going to pull you up on spelling. In all seriousness, why do you think that scientists, physicists, etc. are lying?

Marlon pointed out earlier in the thread that George lamaitre ( first to discover what lead to the big bang theory ) was also a devout Catholic priest.