The real average size

[Pegasus]

Bet I have seen more posts of this type DaveX .

[Pegasus]

I love posts like these - it's so interesting to repeatedly see the same kind of disbelief in the newer studies.
I think that the 1948 Kinsey study (68 years ago!) - which as we now know was *hugely* flawed allowing
self reporting is partly responsible. Along with porn - these two things over the years have almost cemented in the minds of people that the average size 6" - when newer studies almost certainly prove this is simply not true. When it comes to the internet there are many many many articles about average size - with zero reference's or citations that usually state some random average range 5-7" is average 5.3-7.5" is average blah blah blah......always seemingly
average to high average range - rarely covering both ends of the scale.


And then once shown this info - folk tend to over critically think as to why the new studies are wrong - it's hilarious really


My favourite is when people represent some females experience with a sample size of 4 men as the definitive "Study" - cracks me up every time!


it's almost a case study in brainwashing/mis-information on a global scale


This is not a attack on you OP - it's a very common thing - it's just I have seen so many posts like this - it's never ending!

What studies would you use btw?

[zbmarc]

no where did I read that the average was exactly 4.7, that first thing I posted was the average range (4.7-6.3) which I've read in several articles. Snapchat even recently posted an article, written by a man with micropenis, where he also posts that number range. So the average of that is 5.5 with a std. dev. of 1.2. And by no means am I complaining because either way I fall under as "average", but it just kinda plays with my head that I'm slightly above this supposed average yet I still don't think I'm all that big. That would also make 4.7 not an outlier, but within a standard deviation, making it apparently common, which again just doesn't sound right to me.

[IronGymmer]

Why does this matter so much, just focus on being the best you can be personally. Does it really make a difference if the other guys have one inch less or more in their pants?

[zbmarc]

I can't agree more with what you said, it's just my curiosity and irrational thoughts running wild.



I JUST WANNA KNO DA TROOTH MAYNE.

[zbmarc]

Everyone knows that the average penis size is 8 inches, anything under 7 is embarrassingly small and big starts around 10 inches.

In fact, if you were to ask most women, they routinely come across 10+ inche dongs.

now THIS... this is something I can reason with.













lmao

[Phoenix7672]

Everyone knows that the average penis size is 8 inches, anything under 7 is embarrassingly small and big starts around 10 inches.

In fact, if you were to ask most women, they routinely come across 10+ inche dongs.

Sweet it's gone down! Was getting tired of hearing how the average is 12", and they like 14-18" from time to time. (also that pornstars are in the 18-24" range).

[master-gauge]

Why does this matter so much, just focus on being the best you can be personally. Does it really make a difference if the other guys have one inch less or more in their pants?

Bingo.. Showing u actually care about how u look and act is really what is attractive to females.. We don't all look like CK models, BUT being cleaned up when possible, "Trying" to keep off extra weight, smelling good (that can be massive, for a yes or no).. In other words, show that u are putting an effort into yourself and life, this makes people want to be around u.. That makes females want to be around u..

I dress just a little bit better when I go out now, this means a well fitting jacket, and a "clean" well fitting pair of jeans, t-shirt with a fresh hair cut.. Plus I try to smell half decent.. I get more looks and attention from females then other guys.. Why?? Because they've been wearing the same jeans 3-4 days in a row, or their in track pants and a dirty t-shirt around here.. So, they get over "looked".. Basically I dress clean, and have a fresh hair cut and I'm shaved or trimmed.. It's really that simple.. Sound shallow?? Yes it is, but also shows effort..

I always said women will not remember u unless really small, OR really large.. They will remember if u know "the way around the bedroom" thou along with the above..

[DaveX]

Pegasus - the study that I would use would be the Veale meta study:

Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15?521 men - Veale - 2015 - BJU International - Wiley Online Library

That was done by the NHS trust and Kings college London - I think I read that it was done in response to find a real average after too many referrals for small penis size (I could be wrong here, but too many referrals would logically mean that too many men feel their size is too small from incorrect media bias/word of mouth e.t.c.).

I would use this study because

1) No professional is going to put their name on a paper if it's total garbage

2) NHS have nothing to gain, because they are a non profit org.

3) Kings college London wouldn't attach themselves to this and discredit their rep if it was garbage


I do trust this study the most - it seems the most sensible and accurate way to do (BPFSL e.t.c.).

DaveX

[Pegasus]

Pegasus - the study that I would use would be the Veale meta study:

Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15?521 men - Veale - 2015 - BJU International - Wiley Online Library

That was done by the NHS trust and Kings college London - I think I read that it was done in response to find a real average after too many referrals for small penis size (I could be wrong here, but too many referrals would logically mean that too many men feel their size is too small from incorrect media bias/word of mouth e.t.c.).

I would use this study because

1) No professional is going to put their name on a paper if it's total garbage

2) NHS have nothing to gain, because they are a non profit org.

3) Kings college London wouldn't attach themselves to this and discredit their rep if it was garbage


I do trust this study the most - it seems the most sensible and accurate way to do (BPFSL e.t.c.).

DaveX

Fair enough .
This study did attract a lot of attention on this site when it came out . There was a lot of criticism of it's methodology . Guys checking the base studies found that they did not always conform to the criteria stated . Most base studies did not have erect length , large indian study skewed erect length , confusion over bpel/nbpel yada yada . Mind you most every study published has been criticised here.