Results 11 to 20 of 72
Thread: The real average size
- 10-27-2016 #11
PE Gym Editor
PEGym Hero ☺Admin of the Month Mar 2015
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 40,275
- Blog Entries
- 5
Bet I have seen more posts of this type DaveX .
- 10-27-2016 #12
PE Gym Editor
PEGym Hero ☺Admin of the Month Mar 2015
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 40,275
- Blog Entries
- 5
- 10-27-2016 #13
- Join Date
- Sep 2016
- Posts
- 14
no where did I read that the average was exactly 4.7, that first thing I posted was the average range (4.7-6.3) which I've read in several articles. Snapchat even recently posted an article, written by a man with micropenis, where he also posts that number range. So the average of that is 5.5 with a std. dev. of 1.2. And by no means am I complaining because either way I fall under as "average", but it just kinda plays with my head that I'm slightly above this supposed average yet I still don't think I'm all that big. That would also make 4.7 not an outlier, but within a standard deviation, making it apparently common, which again just doesn't sound right to me.
Starting:
FLACCID:
- NBPL: ~4
- NBPSL: 5.5
- BPSL: 7
- Girth: 4.2
ERECT:
- NBPL: ~6
- BPL: 6.8
- Girth: 5.5
Goal:
- BPEL: 7.5/8
- Girth: 6
- 10-27-2016 #14
Why does this matter so much, just focus on being the best you can be personally. Does it really make a difference if the other guys have one inch less or more in their pants?
- 10-27-2016 #15
- Join Date
- Sep 2016
- Posts
- 14
I can't agree more with what you said, it's just my curiosity and irrational thoughts running wild.
I JUST WANNA KNO DA TROOTH MAYNE.Starting:
FLACCID:
- NBPL: ~4
- NBPSL: 5.5
- BPSL: 7
- Girth: 4.2
ERECT:
- NBPL: ~6
- BPL: 6.8
- Girth: 5.5
Goal:
- BPEL: 7.5/8
- Girth: 6
- 10-27-2016 #16
- Join Date
- Sep 2016
- Posts
- 14
- 10-27-2016 #17
Member of the Month Oct 2015
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- To the Cervix...and Beyond!
- Posts
- 2,845
Original/Current Stats:
2014-09-01: BPEL 6.8"/NBPEL 6" MEG 5.0", BPFL 5"/NBPFL 4" FG 4.4"
2019-03-16: BPEL 8"/NBPEL 6.75" MEG 5.2", BPFL 6.75"/NBPFL 5.5" FG 4.5"
Goals:
Realistic: BPEL 8.5"/NBPEL 7.5" MEG 5.5"
Optimistic: BPEL 9"/NBPEL 8" MEG 5.75"
Dream: BPEL 10"/NBPEL 9" MEG 6.5"
- 10-27-2016 #18
Member of the Month May 2016
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Location
- Among The Pretty Gingers!!
- Posts
- 1,985
Bingo..
Showing u actually care about how u look and act is really what is attractive to females.. We don't all look like CK models, BUT being cleaned up when possible, "Trying" to keep off extra weight, smelling good (that can be massive, for a yes or no).. In other words, show that u are putting an effort into yourself and life, this makes people want to be around u.. That makes females want to be around u..
I dress just a little bit better when I go out now, this means a well fitting jacket, and a "clean" well fitting pair of jeans, t-shirt with a fresh hair cut.. Plus I try to smell half decent.. I get more looks and attention from females then other guys.. Why?? Because they've been wearing the same jeans 3-4 days in a row, or their in track pants and a dirty t-shirt around here.. So, they get over "looked".. Basically I dress clean, and have a fresh hair cut and I'm shaved or trimmed.. It's really that simple.. Sound shallow?? Yes it is, but also shows effort..
I always said women will not remember u unless really small, OR really large.. They will remember if u know "the way around the bedroom" thou along with the above..Start: 11/2013: BPEL: 4.73" MEG: 4.5"
Best: BPEL: 7" MEG: 5.625"
Current:BPEL: 7" MEG: 5.5"
- 10-27-2016 #19
- Join Date
- Aug 2016
- Posts
- 27
Pegasus - the study that I would use would be the Veale meta study:
Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15?521 men - Veale - 2015 - BJU International - Wiley Online Library
That was done by the NHS trust and Kings college London - I think I read that it was done in response to find a real average after too many referrals for small penis size (I could be wrong here, but too many referrals would logically mean that too many men feel their size is too small from incorrect media bias/word of mouth e.t.c.).
I would use this study because
1) No professional is going to put their name on a paper if it's total garbage
2) NHS have nothing to gain, because they are a non profit org.
3) Kings college London wouldn't attach themselves to this and discredit their rep if it was garbage
I do trust this study the most - it seems the most sensible and accurate way to do (BPFSL e.t.c.).
DaveX
- 10-27-2016 #20
PE Gym Editor
PEGym Hero ☺Admin of the Month Mar 2015
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 40,275
- Blog Entries
- 5
Fair enough .
This study did attract a lot of attention on this site when it came out . There was a lot of criticism of it's methodology . Guys checking the base studies found that they did not always conform to the criteria stated . Most base studies did not have erect length , large indian study skewed erect length , confusion over bpel/nbpel yada yada . Mind you most every study published has been criticised here.
Put that shat on, veins start...
Cream