The real average size

[zbmarc Junior Member Find all posts View Profile Close zbmarc]

I just have this gut feeling that what researchers have officially recorded as the average penis size is false. What I usually see, in Internet articles, is 4.7"-6.3" (so about 5" or 5.5"). How can this be right? 4.7" is a pretty small penis, not to offend anyone. It almost seems like they recorded the real average and just chopped an inch off, 5.7-7.3 sounds more realistic to me. Am I just being crazy or paranoid? Is the research legit or are they just trying to comfort the average man? I believe the average is 6" so it would make sense to lie and say it's 5", comforting a very large population of men.

[EsteemIssues Member Find all posts View Profile Close EsteemIssues]

Sometime a measurement is how far a condom will go on which is 2" smaller than BPEL.

[Party Senior Member Member of the Month August 2016 Find all posts View Profile Close Party]

Well, I see my dick Doctor tommorrow , for low testosterone , if I remember , I'll get his opinion. But I kinda agree with you OP, as much as it bums me out.

[Ravenously Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close Ravenously]

Everyone knows that the average penis size is 8 inches, anything under 7 is embarrassingly small and big starts around 10 inches.

In fact, if you were to ask most women, they routinely come across 10+ inche dongs.

[Pegasus AdministratorPE Gym EditorPEGym Hero ☺ Admin of the Month Mar 2015 Find all posts View Profile Close Pegasus]

What study says 4.7" bpel I have not seen it ?

There is a great deal of consistency in the studies at over 5" usually high 5 so 5.8".

[master-gauge Senior Member Member of the Month May 2016 Find all posts View Profile Close master-gauge]

Nether have I, if u could find the link for it post it.. And yes that is small, I should know as I use to be that at one point..

I've been going off of that "Wessel's, Schneider, Chen" chart.. With the Chen "line 3 in the chart"..

[Pegasus AdministratorPE Gym EditorPEGym Hero ☺ Admin of the Month Mar 2015 Find all posts View Profile Close Pegasus]

Nether have I, if u could find the link for it post it.. And yes that is small, I should know as I use to be that at one point..

I've been going off of that "Wessel's, Schneider, Chen" chart.. With the Chen "line 3 in the chart"..

That chart just about shows the full study size range

[master-gauge Senior Member Member of the Month May 2016 Find all posts View Profile Close master-gauge]

Yeah there isn't any "how many participated" numbers at the bottom of it, just the data for each one..

[Pegasus AdministratorPE Gym EditorPEGym Hero ☺ Admin of the Month Mar 2015 Find all posts View Profile Close Pegasus]

Other studies fall in the range of those though.

[DaveX Junior Member Find all posts View Profile Close DaveX]

I love posts like these - it's so interesting to repeatedly see the same kind of disbelief in the newer studies.
I think that the 1948 Kinsey study (68 years ago!) - which as we now know was *hugely* flawed allowing
self reporting is partly responsible. Along with porn - these two things over the years have almost cemented in the minds of people that the average size 6" - when newer studies almost certainly prove this is simply not true. When it comes to the internet there are many many many articles about average size - with zero reference's or citations that usually state some random average range 5-7" is average 5.3-7.5" is average blah blah blah......always seemingly
average to high average range - rarely covering both ends of the scale.


And then once shown this info - folk tend to over critically think as to why the new studies are wrong - it's hilarious really


My favourite is when people represent some females experience with a sample size of 4 men as the definitive "Study" - cracks me up every time!


it's almost a case study in brainwashing/mis-information on a global scale


This is not a attack on you OP - it's a very common thing - it's just I have seen so many posts like this - it's never ending!

[Pegasus AdministratorPE Gym EditorPEGym Hero ☺ Admin of the Month Mar 2015 Find all posts View Profile Close Pegasus]

Bet I have seen more posts of this type DaveX .

[Pegasus AdministratorPE Gym EditorPEGym Hero ☺ Admin of the Month Mar 2015 Find all posts View Profile Close Pegasus]

I love posts like these - it's so interesting to repeatedly see the same kind of disbelief in the newer studies.
I think that the 1948 Kinsey study (68 years ago!) - which as we now know was *hugely* flawed allowing
self reporting is partly responsible. Along with porn - these two things over the years have almost cemented in the minds of people that the average size 6" - when newer studies almost certainly prove this is simply not true. When it comes to the internet there are many many many articles about average size - with zero reference's or citations that usually state some random average range 5-7" is average 5.3-7.5" is average blah blah blah......always seemingly
average to high average range - rarely covering both ends of the scale.


And then once shown this info - folk tend to over critically think as to why the new studies are wrong - it's hilarious really


My favourite is when people represent some females experience with a sample size of 4 men as the definitive "Study" - cracks me up every time!


it's almost a case study in brainwashing/mis-information on a global scale


This is not a attack on you OP - it's a very common thing - it's just I have seen so many posts like this - it's never ending!

What studies would you use btw?

[zbmarc Junior Member Find all posts View Profile Close zbmarc]

no where did I read that the average was exactly 4.7, that first thing I posted was the average range (4.7-6.3) which I've read in several articles. Snapchat even recently posted an article, written by a man with micropenis, where he also posts that number range. So the average of that is 5.5 with a std. dev. of 1.2. And by no means am I complaining because either way I fall under as "average", but it just kinda plays with my head that I'm slightly above this supposed average yet I still don't think I'm all that big. That would also make 4.7 not an outlier, but within a standard deviation, making it apparently common, which again just doesn't sound right to me.

[IronGymmer Senior Member Find all posts View Profile Close IronGymmer]

Why does this matter so much, just focus on being the best you can be personally. Does it really make a difference if the other guys have one inch less or more in their pants?

[zbmarc Junior Member Find all posts View Profile Close zbmarc]

I can't agree more with what you said, it's just my curiosity and irrational thoughts running wild.



I JUST WANNA KNO DA TROOTH MAYNE.