Is it possible not all women want a large penis?

[BigO]

I think it is funny how men think they know what is correct and then a lady tells us what is correct, great post MrsL4M, I agree with your post 100%

[Dangler]

Q. Is it possible not all women want a large penis?
A. Yes, many are happy having a vagina, and wouldn't want a penis growing somewhere else on their body.


Q. Well Is it then possible not all men want a small (or large) vagina ?
A. Correct. Some don't want one growing anywhere on their torso/body. No doubt, there are those that would just love to have their own.
(Not to be confused with the slang word "mangina")

This has been brought to you by the PEGym Service of MisInterpretaion & MisUnderstanding.

[camaro]

Women need love first.A dick shows just how much.

[NauseousOuroboros]

I think the easiest criteria for me to begin testing, since every source I've looked at says the same thing, is that a dimpled chin indicates a short, small vagina on a woman (unless the other criteria say otherwise).

The problem is HOW I'm going to get this data. I should have enrolled for that sexology degree back when I graduated high school. I can find gynecological statistics journals but with pictures of the patients faces? Not a chance!

Very tricky. Very tricky indeed. This won't be scientific if I can't test it so I might as well just continue gathering testable hypotheses.

For just some perspective, an Oxford medicine journal;

http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/content/21/6/1618.full

The abstract opens with the line "Vaginal anatomy has been poorly studied."

No shit!

[NauseousOuroboros]

I'm surprised this is even a question to be honest.

Of course not all women want a large penis!

It is ONE part of the male anatomy, and the male physical body is only ONE part of what a woman considers in choosing a mate (and according to most women, it isn't even a big component at that).

If you were so small that penetration was not actually possible or she couldn't feel it, then there would be issues. Or if she had an abnormally large vagina.

But in general, I'd say for probably 99% of the female population, average is more than fine. I don't think there are really that many size queens out there, and at the end of the day, I'd say most of them would still choose a man to marry or based on traits other than his penis size. There are always toys at the end of the day... Or your fist..

Well the purported wisdom behind these cultures ideas is that actually having two people whose sex organs fit like pieces of a puzzle made for not only outstanding sex but outstanding possibilities for the relationship to be a cultivar for both individuals vitality. Basically in plain english without all the Eastern mumbo jumbo about energy fields and chi and acupuncture meridians they found that, if you and your woman fit together like that, you're more likely to live longer, be healthier and be happier, but if you were mismatched, the relationship and the two people in it would age more quickly (the woman, if the man was too big for her and the man, if the woman was too big for him).

[NauseousOuroboros]

Thank you for posting this. I get so tired of hearing the big size BS from the size KINGS. If you feel you need a big one to be happy by all means do it but don't say is just so you can please the woman. We can please ourselves very well with our finger. I don't mean to sound crass but I get annoyed that the threads in here many times makes it look like all we ladies care about is the penis size. Prior to me joining this site I had NEVER had a size conversation with women (I do now, because I brought it up since this seems to be such a big deal to you guys). Girls talk tend to be more about how guys behave towards women, how they look (grooming), since we have different woman there are different tastes, some like muscle bound, some like teddy bear looks.

We tend to be attracted to the whole package, I am talking about people looking for a serious relationship not just a hook up for the night. I have mentioned here that when the Mr and I first got together HE was not the biggest I had at that point but he was the only man who found my orgasm button and I loved that. Since doing PE he is now the largest I have ever been with and guess what, I enjoy his new size and I am happy he reached his goal BUT I PREFERRED it like it was. That is my personal opinion I felt our love making was more intense then, it is harder for me to contract around his new girth which takes away from my orgasm intensity. I am sure males would not like it if their females did something that did the same to their orgasms.

So yes, I agree with the post, it is right on but in here sometimes I feel that people ask for a female perspective and when it doesn't match their ideals it is completely ignored or debated. There is no debate it is what it is, I think many have been influenced by porn and think this is a reality. I say it again, in my 45 yrs (soon to be 46) I have met more size obsessed males (size kings) than female (size queens).

MrsL, your voice here is a really valuable addition. Thank you! I am personally guilty of disbelieving females who tell me size is not important. Some may be lying yes, out of a desire to not wound a man's ego but some are certainly telling the truth! Those who are fibbing really only hurt themselves because instead of allowing themselves to go after what they really need to be sexually happy they become trapped by illogical puritanical taboos. Everyone is different and what is good for one woman's vagina may be bad for another.

[CUSP82]

Sometimes ancient knowledge is just plain stupid. Why do we put so much creedence to "ancient knowledge"? Because it's old? I got stuff in my backyard that's older than some of that ancient knowledge; it's called dirt and rocks. How come we don't listen to them? I know rocks and dirt don't talk do they.

Ancient people, like people nowadays, try to give reason to the world around them and some of it has to do with human relationships. Why did this person stay with this other person? Of course they tried to figure it out the best way they could which really wasn't all that smart but that's all they knew. Oh a girl with a dimpled chin has a small vagina and therefore seeks a male of compatible size. Do you think people ever thought like that? Maybe some old horny monks did to pass the time but that's not how we come together.Oh is sex an important factor in a relationship? Sure but love and compatibility are far more important than the width of the bridge of one's nose. Oh I know when we look at a woman all these things are thought of subconsciously which I think is bull. I pick a girl who has a brain and doesn't look like Frankensteins' sister and I go from there. If genatalia was really all that important we'd be wearing them on our head for all to see and choose.

[NauseousOuroboros]

Sometimes ancient knowledge is just plain stupid. Why do we put so much creedence to "ancient knowledge"? Because it's old? I got stuff in my backyard that's older than some of that ancient knowledge; it's called dirt and rocks. How come we don't listen to them? I know rocks and dirt don't talk do they.

Ancient people, like people nowadays, try to give reason to the world around them and some of it has to do with human relationships. Why did this person stay with this other person? Of course they tried to figure it out the best way they could which really wasn't all that smart but that's all they knew. Oh a girl with a dimpled chin has a small vagina and therefore seeks a male of compatible size. Do you think people ever thought like that? Maybe some old horny monks did to pass the time but that's not how we come together.Oh is sex an important factor in a relationship? Sure but love and compatibility are far more important than the width of the bridge of one's nose. Oh I know when we look at a woman all these things are thought of subconsciously which I think is bull. I pick a girl who has a brain and doesn't look like Frankensteins' sister and I go from there. If genatalia was really all that important we'd be wearing them on our head for all to see and choose.

Well, we do listen to dirt and rocks. When archaeologists study a particular excavation site for example, the rock and soil of the area contains vital data in piecing together the overall picture of what was happening at the time. Geology has taught humanity quite a bit about the world, how it was formed and how it works from its study of rocks and dirt. In a way, they do talk. Especially quartz, which has powered numerous electrical devices, especially ones used for communication. Heck most of our cell phones and computers consume so much rocks and dirt in production, albeit very special ones, that we see mining corporations rushing to Afghanistan to strip mine lithium in the middle of a war zone.

Yes, ancient people tried to give reason to the world around them. Does their age mean they failed or succeeded? It sounds like you are saying it is the former, but it is not so cut and dry. We are still around thanks to them and the obstacles they overcame. I understand your issue with treating ancient knowledge as special. Often people use the age of something as a defense to its validity. I am not doing this though. I am revisiting an ancient concept and looking for ways to test its validity because if it is true, I believe it could help alleviate a great deal of anxiety in modern society. Ancient history and tradition has value. Not all the time and not always value we can use immediately but value is there nonetheless, if only to understand the world through a different perspective.

I think you misunderstand the tradition though. It was not old horny monks who thought this way. Entire societies and traditions were built upon these and many other analogous concepts. Again, I do not mean to imply validity to them by saying that; just to say that yes, at one time entire societies did think that way and there is certainly a good chance their assumptions were not stupid at all but were actually helpful in creating social harmony if they were based off of truth, now long forgotten.

That is why I'm so interested in this.

Also I think it facetious of you to argue that genitalia is not all that important on a penis improvement forum. Yes, relationships are built on far more than genitalia however good or bad sexual compatibility can help or harm a couple tremendously. We have all seen the crippling ego issues and anxieties, failed relationships, cheating and so on that have at their root sexual compatibility issues. On this forum it is dramatically evident. There are dozens of posts almost daily showing this is a real and important issue in an intimate relationship.

[thenewdude]

This is very debatable because most vaginas do accommodate to most size (if not too thin/thick/long/short) in given time (henceforth where women who sleep around are loose. Yes, because they are not in a constant sexual relationship with one man to really accommodate so naturally for the vagina to protect itself from injury will stay loose). I have known more women to leave a their man because he was too large than too small. Yeah, you may have some more deeper or wider (and vice verse) than others but most are about the same just like most penis size are about the same.

Only about 1-2/3rds of the vagina from the entrance (vulva) upward is sexually sensitive during arousal while the rest is not at all (this is medical and biological fact). The size queens (speaking lengthwise) like the cervix push while most women don't where average length even slightly above average not hitting the cervix during full penetration is preferred.

The real issues has nothing to do with penis size within the average world but us thinking who are average that they would be more satisfied if it were a little bit thicker or longer when really what they wants is to be satisfied with their man and all that his is and can become.

[CUSP82]

Well, we do listen to dirt and rocks. When archaeologists study a particular excavation site for example, the rock and soil of the area contains vital data in piecing together the overall picture of what was happening at the time. Geology has taught humanity quite a bit about the world, how it was formed and how it works from its study of rocks and dirt. In a way, they do talk. Especially quartz, which has powered numerous electrical devices, especially ones used for communication. Heck most of our cell phones and computers consume so much rocks and dirt in production, albeit very special ones, that we see mining corporations rushing to Afghanistan to strip mine lithium in the middle of a war zone.

Yes, ancient people tried to give reason to the world around them. Does their age mean they failed or succeeded? It sounds like you are saying it is the former, but it is not so cut and dry. We are still around thanks to them and the obstacles they overcame. I understand your issue with treating ancient knowledge as special. Often people use the age of something as a defense to its validity. I am not doing this though. I am revisiting an ancient concept and looking for ways to test its validity because if it is true, I believe it could help alleviate a great deal of anxiety in modern society. Ancient history and tradition has value. Not all the time and not always value we can use immediately but value is there nonetheless, if only to understand the world through a different perspective.

I think you misunderstand the tradition though. It was not old horny monks who thought this way. Entire societies and traditions were built upon these and many other analogous concepts. Again, I do not mean to imply validity to them by saying that; just to say that yes, at one time entire societies did think that way and there is certainly a good chance their assumptions were not stupid at all but were actually helpful in creating social harmony if they were based off of truth, now long forgotten.

That is why I'm so interested in this.

Also I think it facetious of you to argue that genitalia is not all that important on a penis improvement forum. Yes, relationships are built on far more than genitalia however good or bad sexual compatibility can help or harm a couple tremendously. We have all seen the crippling ego issues and anxieties, failed relationships, cheating and so on that have at their root sexual compatibility issues. On this forum it is dramatically evident. There are dozens of posts almost daily showing this is a real and important issue in an intimate relationship.

Main point from all of this; as long as it works genitalia is not important. It is our misguided brains, it studies that say ancients figured our that certain people match up with other people based on genitalia size and properties, and those really stupid ones that get drunk young girls to say dick size is important; that's what messes up our brain. Personally rum does it for me and not all that other stupid stuff.