Tweet
I've watched my fair share of blue movies and have noticed some things.
1) the "big" guys are all slender or down right skinny. They can't help but have "big" dicks.
2) some of the big guys in the porn biz are "outters" vs inners, i.e., their slender and their nuts sit on the outside ofthier body if you will. This makes them look large because they have a 2 inch advantage over the poor slob who's sac is indented. Feel me? Look at Byron Long. The brotha' has a large member, but his hips naturally protrude forward and his genetics place his sac on the outside of his body. He has a big advantage over guys who have a higher body fat % and who's hips don't "jut" forward.
3. If you can't measure from the bottom, how can you measure from the top when you're built like a Byron Long? If the argument of "well you cna measure from the bottom because you can't put the nuts in a vagina," then the same should hold true for someone who have a longer length, but can't put the nuts in also. Feel me?
I'm new to the site, but have loved what I've seen thus far. Does size matter? Sure. If it didn't, you would have all the ink wasted on the topic. Does it matter to chicks? Yeah I think it does, way more than they want to admit. But they are absolutely the worst size "guestimators" on the planet? They wouldn't know an 8 inch dingers from a 6 incher.
So, gentlemen, why don't we focus more on the body than the organ? Aren't most of us about the same sizewise? Is there that much difference between a 5.5" and 6.0? Porn has really killed it for us. I can recall watching some Mandingo shit and really feeling down. But he's not the norm, we are. He's great for what he does and that's sell movies based on a stereotype. Try as we might, most of us will never get there. So be happy. Try to improve, but be realistic. We can tug on the wanker all day long, but if we have a "dicky-do" then we're focusing on the wrong thing.
1) the "big" guys are all slender or down right skinny. They can't help but have "big" dicks.
2) some of the big guys in the porn biz are "outters" vs inners, i.e., their slender and their nuts sit on the outside ofthier body if you will. This makes them look large because they have a 2 inch advantage over the poor slob who's sac is indented. Feel me? Look at Byron Long. The brotha' has a large member, but his hips naturally protrude forward and his genetics place his sac on the outside of his body. He has a big advantage over guys who have a higher body fat % and who's hips don't "jut" forward.
3. If you can't measure from the bottom, how can you measure from the top when you're built like a Byron Long? If the argument of "well you cna measure from the bottom because you can't put the nuts in a vagina," then the same should hold true for someone who have a longer length, but can't put the nuts in also. Feel me?
I'm new to the site, but have loved what I've seen thus far. Does size matter? Sure. If it didn't, you would have all the ink wasted on the topic. Does it matter to chicks? Yeah I think it does, way more than they want to admit. But they are absolutely the worst size "guestimators" on the planet? They wouldn't know an 8 inch dingers from a 6 incher.
So, gentlemen, why don't we focus more on the body than the organ? Aren't most of us about the same sizewise? Is there that much difference between a 5.5" and 6.0? Porn has really killed it for us. I can recall watching some Mandingo shit and really feeling down. But he's not the norm, we are. He's great for what he does and that's sell movies based on a stereotype. Try as we might, most of us will never get there. So be happy. Try to improve, but be realistic. We can tug on the wanker all day long, but if we have a "dicky-do" then we're focusing on the wrong thing.
Admin of the Month Mar 2015
Comment