Since starting my PE journey a couple of weeks ago, I've been spending a substantial amount of time on this forum, reading up on things, to learn the ropes but also to calibrate my expectations.
One thing that strikes me - befuddles me even - when it comes to gains, is the divergence of bpel and npbel. They rarely follow suit it seems. The former is gaining faster than the latter.
Perhaps I'm missing something here - that's why I'm posting this - but unless pe:ers are consistently putting on weight, thus increasing the size of their fat-pads, the explanation ought to be the pelvic bone? Repeatedly shoving a ruler towards it and/or using penis pumps could perhaps dislocate it with a fraction of an inch?
Or is it the pe:ing itself that causes this discrepancy between bpel and npbel? Meaning that stretching causes bigger fat-pads.
Being new to this world, it's likely a stupid question, but since I haven't found an answer to it, I'll just put it out there for the intelligentsia to either mull over or make fun of.
One thing that strikes me - befuddles me even - when it comes to gains, is the divergence of bpel and npbel. They rarely follow suit it seems. The former is gaining faster than the latter.
Perhaps I'm missing something here - that's why I'm posting this - but unless pe:ers are consistently putting on weight, thus increasing the size of their fat-pads, the explanation ought to be the pelvic bone? Repeatedly shoving a ruler towards it and/or using penis pumps could perhaps dislocate it with a fraction of an inch?
Or is it the pe:ing itself that causes this discrepancy between bpel and npbel? Meaning that stretching causes bigger fat-pads.
Being new to this world, it's likely a stupid question, but since I haven't found an answer to it, I'll just put it out there for the intelligentsia to either mull over or make fun of.
Comment