IS the average size measured in bpel? or nbpel?

[Messerschmidt]

What about this
Definitive Penis Size Survey Results
White 6.5" , Black 6.1" ?

Seems like utter nonsense, but they do have a ton of graphs. I'm torn.

[DemOne]

Penis pill websites have a ton of graphs too.

[Messerschmidt]

I'd have to compare. The validity of evidence is usually based on the amount of graphs you have, so we'll have to see who comes out on top.

[closeed258]

I checked the Mr average link (been there before). Heres what they say the methodology was of the Lifestyles condoms study conducted in Cancun. "Measuring of length was from the point at the base of the erect penis where the top of the penile shaft meets the pubic area to the tip of the glans" I cannot understand how anyone can interpret that as being bone pressed. Why would a condom manufacturer care about BP. When you put a condom on only the NBP portion of the penis goes into the condom. I also checked the lifestyles website but could not locate any info on it. I found some discussion on Thunders about it and located quite a few members that believe it is NBP also based on the wording of the methodology and because they make condoms. It is and probably always will be highly disputed until Lifestyles clarifies its exact methodology. I hope it was actually BP for obvious reasons but based on what I read I dont think it was.

No study I have ever read has said they used BP. And a condom manufacture would never use BP as they do it to get a better fitting size for there condoms and BP would ruin it. There is a shit load of "studies" who say the average size is 5" in some and others 6" but they all have flaws and never say if it is done BP so your guess is a good as anyone elses on this forum. My guess is 5.5"NBPEL minimum.

[DemOne]

No study I have ever read has said they used BP. And a condom manufacture would never use BP as they do it to get a better fitting size for there condoms and BP would ruin it. There is a shit load of "studies" who say the average size is 5" in some and others 6" but they all have flaws and never say if it is done BP so your guess is a good as anyone elses on this forum. My guess is 5.5"NBPEL minimum.

Got any proof to back it up that the studies are not bone pressed and that condom companies don't care about bone pressed length?

[closeed258]

Got any proof to back it up that the studies are not bone pressed and that condom companies don't care about bone pressed length?

Well have they ever said they are BP? Not someone in a different forum or a different site but the site that shows the actual study, I have never seen it so have no reason to believe it is.

Well it's common sense for a condom company who is doing a study to find "the average" length and girth to find condoms that would fit a larger number of people therefore selling more and making more profit, so why would they ruin there study by measuring BP because that would make there condoms to long for "the average" length.

[DemOne]

Well have they ever said they are BP? Not someone in a different forum or a different site but the site that shows the actual study, I have never seen it so have no reason to believe it is.

Well it's common sense for a condom company who is doing a study to find "the average" length and girth to find condoms that would fit a larger number of people therefore selling more and making more profit, so why would they ruin there study by measuring BP because that would make there condoms to long for "the average" length.

Yes, they have said they have measured in BP, except they do not use the term bone pressed; that's something that was created in the PE world. They say they measure to the base of the pelvic region, which would be measuring at the Pubic Symphysis which is where we measure for bone pressed. It's just not a bone so they'll never call it bone pressed.

What's behind the fat pad gets used during sex in most cases. Why would they not want to measure that to get the actual penile average length and wind up with condoms that are too short? I could see them not measuring bone pressed if the fat pad was a solid object that could not be depressed at all, especially in sex, but that's not reality. Also with varying bodyweights/fat percentages, visible length will change. They'd have to have condoms for fit people, average people, and obese people since what's visible can easily change by inches with as little as 50lbs of fat. Even hydration levels from day to day can change one's non-bone pressed length.

Instead they get true average lengths an girths, and and regular condoms make them to fit average girth and usually more than average length so that they know the condoms will fit a wider range of people and still be able to provide effective protection.

Edit: Anyway, I just sent them an email for confirmation.

[closeed258]

Yes, they have said they have measured in BP, except they do not use the term bone pressed; that's something that was created in the PE world. They say they measure to the base of the pelvic region, which would be measuring at the Pubic Symphysis which is where we measure for bone pressed. It's just not a bone so they'll never call it bone pressed.

What's behind the fat pad gets used during sex in most cases. Why would they not want to measure that to get the actual penile average length and wind up with condoms that are too short? I could see them not measuring bone pressed if the fat pad was a solid object that could not be depressed at all, especially in sex, but that's not reality. Also with varying bodyweights/fat percentages, visible length will change. They'd have to have condoms for fit people, average people, and obese people since what's visible can easily change by inches with as little as 50lbs of fat. Even hydration levels from day to day can change one's non-bone pressed length.

Instead they get true average lengths an girths, and and regular condoms make them to fit average girth and usually more than average length so that they know the condoms will fit a wider range of people and still be able to provide effective protection.

Edit: Anyway, I just sent them an email for confirmation.

It would be impossible to put a condom on to cover BPEL so it would be a stupid of them to do it. And they should and probably would say something like "pressed into the pubic bone" for BPEL

[DemOne]

It would be impossible to put a condom on to cover BPEL so it would be a stupid of them to do it. And they should and probably would say something like "pressed into the pubic bone" for BPEL

It is possible to do that, and there's many ways of saying the same thing. They were just out to please the medical and scientific community, not the penis enlargement forum community.

[closeed258]

It is possible to do that, and there's many ways of saying the same thing. They were just out to please the medical and scientific community, not the penis enlargement forum community.

Well when a scientific study has taken place they usually say how it was done and all the info for everyone to see not just keep it to themselves and release little bits here and there.