- 06-02-2012 #1
found this just now, and thought I would share
- 06-02-2012 #2
- 06-02-2012 #3
This chart was posted here few times. It only created fruitless debate.Start(11.24.11) BPEL 6 7/8 EG 4 7/8
- 06-02-2012 #4
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Killer Cali
The chart is hearsay based.
It's bad - not because bigger isn't better (which, in every case, it is) but because it's assumptions are way off the mark.
- 06-02-2012 #5
This chart is always good for a laughPEGym Theme Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RH76tfDxm7Y
- 06-02-2012 #6
I would question the chart makers motives. Those sizes are so unrealistic, specially the girth ones. I call shenanigans! Must be someone trying to get guys to feel inadequate about their size, thereby convincing them to buy their enlargement methods, creams, or surgery.Starting stats
April 3, 2012
BPEL - 6"
EG - 6"
- 06-02-2012 #7
I would suggest posting opposing articles, graphs or references. Just attacking the graph without providing an alternative, makes it look as if you have an issue with you not being in the ideal coordinate.The above is not meant to be argumentative, abrasive or confrontational. Take this and everything you read with a grain of salt.
- 06-02-2012 #8
The graph is bullshit, its been here at the gym many times. Just pull out a 9 x 7 zuchini and see if you could find even one girl that would sy she wants a cock that big.Going an inch and 1/2 deeper than before
- 06-02-2012 #9
Provide an alternative. Any alternative. All this "Dammit is doesn't say what I want to hear so it must be a lie" drives me crazy. We need to get away from personal opinions influencing the collective and move back to a fact based general consensus.... Regardless if it meshes with your personal opinion or not. Do your homework and provide us with something to ponder. Don't be lazy and use cursing or anger to hide the fact you have no proof to back up your views.
I am not picking on any one person, specifically BigO, whom I respect. But this is not an average size dick support group and we should be searching out truths here.
Personally, I don't think the graph is correct but that's all I have to offer. Big difference between "I don't think" and "it is".
Last edited by Cya at 8; 06-02-2012 at 10:11 AM.The above is not meant to be argumentative, abrasive or confrontational. Take this and everything you read with a grain of salt.
- 06-02-2012 #10
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Portland, OR
You know the part about the length gets me because even naturally 7+ I would sometime go TOO deep causing issues hoping after her short pause to let the cervical pain die down, we could continue. So the ideal length is probably in reality somewhere like 6.5-7 where there should be no discomfort.
The girth just makes me laugh even more! LOL! Because there are not many men who naturally have 6+ in girth (well, maybe more so at the base where the cs is usually thickest). The part that is most missed when men fall into this trap is that this chart was developed my a penile enlargement site originally whose whole purpose is for that dude to fall into that lie so that he might get into their product feeling all insecure about himself now in the sack relating to his penis.
What a joke!Begin 7/25/2011:
NBPEL 7, BPEL 7.2, MEG 5.6, BEG 6
FL 5.25, FG 5.2
NBPEL 7.8, BPEL 8.1, UEG 5.75, MEG 6.25, BEG 6.7
- By mika in forum Poll ForumReplies: 72Last Post: 07-25-2012, 12:53 PM
- By Rando in forum The GymReplies: 1Last Post: 03-12-2012, 06:21 AM
- By Bigjack in forum Penis Enlargement ForumReplies: 10Last Post: 03-15-2011, 06:58 AM
- By MaxP in forum The GymReplies: 13Last Post: 09-16-2010, 06:16 PM
- By gohanss2dp in forum Beginner's ForumReplies: 23Last Post: 08-07-2010, 08:57 AM