Results 61 to 70 of 77
Thread: Penile girth averages and modes
- 07-06-2012 #61
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Posts
- 170
5/27/12: BPEL 6.25 EG: 5.125
6/04/12: BPEL 6.50 EG: 5.500 (think from EQ gains only)
- 07-07-2012 #62
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Posts
- 235
Just wondered about something, if 8inches + length is around top 1-5%( roughly 1 in 100 men) and 6 inches girth is top 1-5%( Roughly 1in 100 men) does it really means 8 inches length with 6 inces girth is 1 in 10000 men?? or length and girth is correlated??
- 07-07-2012 #63
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Posts
- 170
I'm not to sure length and girth is correlated as some might hope. There are plenty of long guys with smaller girth same as shorter guys with bigger girth.
5/27/12: BPEL 6.25 EG: 5.125
6/04/12: BPEL 6.50 EG: 5.500 (think from EQ gains only)
- 07-07-2012 #64
Actually, over 8" would be well over 1 in 100 men. According to this excellent post https://www.pegym.com/forums/penis-e...arge-ones.html, 8.35" would be about 1 in 741 men . If you interpolate the data (rough figure through linear interpolation), 8" should be right about 1 in 444 men.
Length and girth don't appear to be correlated. This is why the average length:girth ratio raises signifigantly as BPEL increases. For example, a 6" BPEL x 5" EG has a ratio of 1.2. A 7x5.5 has a ratio of almost 1.3 and an 8x6 has a ratio of 1.33.. Hell, an 8x5.5 has a ratio of 1.45, and this is probably way more common than an 8x6. As you can see, modest BPEL measurements normally fall in the 1.0-1.2 ratio range.. An 8" BPEL penis at a 1.0-1.2 ratio would be nearly 8" in girth, and this is exceedingly rare! This is why you will see that 8"+ BPEL penises normally fall near a 1.3-1.6 ratio.
If length and girth were truly coupled, you would expect the ratio to remain relatively the same as BPEL increases, but thats simply not what you find.
- 07-07-2012 #65
PE Gym Editor
PEGym Hero ☺Admin of the Month Mar 2015
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 40,285
- Blog Entries
- 5
There is some corelation in that 8" bpel is likely to be over average girth ,but the ectent is unknown. In any case if 8" bpel were 1 in 100 you can be quite sure 8 by 6 is a lot less common ,perhaps not 1 in 10000 but still.
- 07-07-2012 #66
Still, the numbers don't lie. Most 8" BPELs that i can recall seeing are more in the 5.5-5.8 girth range (1.4-1.5 to 1 ratio). Yes, this is larger than most girths at a lower BPEL, but what I was illustrating is its not linear. There is a loose correlation there, but the more BPEL attained, the "longer and skinnier" the overall ratio.
You bring up a good point in 8x6 being a lot less frequent than 8x5.5.. For simplicity's sake, if the your length was 1 in 100 and your girth was 1 in 100, then your volume is definitely way more than 1 in 100 (but less than 1 in 10000 if you multiplied the rarities). My personal belief is that the reality would lie right in the middle of these two extremes at 1 in 5000
Perhaps a crapshoot formula? I believe this would give a ballpak figure...
((length_scarcity * girth_scarcity) - ((length_scarcity + girth_scarcity)/2))/2
EDIT:
Freaky timing... A new user just posted: https://www.pegym.com/forums/introdu...tml#post512214
starting stats of 8.25x4.9. This is nearly a 1.7 length to girth ratio. For reference, an average BPEL at the same ratio would have an EG of below 3.5". This is a good example of how loosely the correlation between length and girth is, IMO
- 07-09-2012 #67
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Posts
- 1,980
This is true of course, but I'd have thought this point would be so obvious as not to need spelling out? Any case, there's the 'official' average figures as well, taken from surveys conducted by condom manufacturers for example, who obviously have a strong financial incentive to get as accurate a figure as possible so they can make condoms that fit most men without either splitting or falling off.
- 07-09-2012 #68
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Posts
- 1,980
Agreed. The only large-scale survey I've heard of that came out with an average figure over 6" was Kinsey's, which has been criticized on a number of points, not least because it relied largely on self-reported measurements. Although even then, I think the exact figure was something like 6.2".
Every other survey I've read about has come out with a number under 6". Some are really small, like not much over 5" or even a bit under, but I think these have tended to be samples of older men, guys with circulatory problems, or men who for whatever reason might have a bigger fat pad or lower EQ than average.
The 'average of averages' from various different surveys would seem to me to be about 5.75".
- 07-09-2012 #69
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Posts
- 170
- 07-10-2012 #70
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Posts
- 287
As a pharmacist I probably see more condoms sold than most here. I would estimate that I sell 10 boxes of regular condoms to every 1 box of large.
Just look at the selection, there are 10-12 options for regular condoms and 3-4 for large size at most drugstores.
If 5" and up was as common as some think (on PE boards at least), thre would be more options for the larger men.
One of these days I'm going to measure the girth of my tounge, as I've had much more sucess in pleasuring women with that than my penis!
I'll tell you that the girth of my middle fingers is 2.5", and I've had some,just let's say,"explosive" results with them as well!Advice from my Dad when I was 16 "It ain't how you cut the mustard, it's how you lick the jar!" Thanks Dad!
Similar Threads
-
Facial filler used for penile girth enhancement
By Big Al in forum The GymReplies: 13Last Post: 11-19-2013, 06:14 PM -
Discolored penile look.
By snakehead in forum Penis Devices ForumReplies: 7Last Post: 08-05-2011, 10:58 PM -
Penile Length is Normal in Most Men Seeking Penile Lengthening Procedures (Surgery)
By blink2000 in forum PE Theory & Science ForumReplies: 2Last Post: 08-21-2010, 05:38 AM -
Modes to get away…
By genome in forum Exercise & Health ForumReplies: 2Last Post: 05-16-2010, 11:12 PM -
Penile injury
By gee111 in forum Beginner's ForumReplies: 2Last Post: 03-21-2008, 02:47 AM
I want to try to come back to...
wide-eyed