Have you put any stock into the TGC theory and applied that to your routines?
(As an aside, is the TGC theory still sound or has it been discredited?)
I don't recall it being discredited, and personally I do believe in it.
A real man never hurts a woman. The woman came out of a man’s rib, not from his feet to be walked on, and not from his head to be superior, but from his side to be equal. Under the arm to be protected, and next to the heart to be loved. - Mrs. workin_4_it
You may not be super long, but a lot of chicks will really enjoy your length. I'm will to bet that you'll get more mileage off of girth, and doing so will make ladies feel tighter to you as well. I've gone from 5" to around 5.35" regular and up to 5.5" MEG when I wear a not-terribly-tight cock ring and the differences are notable and f'n awesome...
The connective tissues of the penis are physically attached to the smooth muscle, and stretching smooth muscle induces hyperplasia within the cells. So there will never be a need to switch up strategies between length and girth exercises, as TGC theory claims.
Length first, girth second.
Also, if you want to pleasure women, I recommend you find at least one of them and practice.
TGC theory has not been discredited officially yet, but it will be.
And why is that? There are many members who corroborate the theory with their experiences. In fact, I don't think I've ever read any post saying "the TGC theory is bogus, etc" "because...".
According to it, the tunica is my limit. In nearly 4 months of PEing, I'm yet to see any gains with the begginer routines (first remek's, now kingpole's). I'll start a new routine in May, this one incorporating tunica exercises. If it works as well as it did for other members who were in my situation, then I'll gladly defend it.
There's much more evidence corroborating it then the opposite. Besides, it does make sense. I don't see why you think it'll be discredited.
I've made a few posts listing my reasons. It's not about "making sense", it's about being scientifically accurate. If someone doesn't understand a concept because it "doesn't make sense" does that mean the concept is incorrect?
So you are saying that since you didn't make gains with the newbie routines, that if you come back with a more advanced and specific routine and make gains, you will attribute that to the validity of TGC theory instead of the progression of intensity?
I'm on my phone right now because I'm on campus so I can't give you a detailed post about my grievances with TGC theory. I have made posts detailing why comparing BPFSL to BPEL is nonsense.
Comment