Okay, I'm probably stirring up a ruckus again, but I think this needs to be addressed. For starters, let me say that I'm not looking for anecdotes about your or other people's gains. Gains can be faked, lied about, measured poorly, result from unrelated factors (i.e. natural growth, which can occur into one's mid-twenties), be the product of EQ variation, etc.
What I'm looking for is an explanation as to how flaccid or semi-erect jelqing could possibly work. If you can explain the mechanism, and your explanation is consistent with anatomy and physics, then it'd be pretty hard to doubt your statements.
I think flaccid and semi-erect jelqing can be a great way to restore blood flow after other exercises, and I also think the EQ benefits can support gains.
But, if you're spending more than 10 minutes jelqing like that, and thinking it's going to make your penis bigger, I think you're wasting your time.
You're not going to get gains unless you expand your tissues beyond their normal capacity. If you jelq at 50% erection and expand it to 60%, you're still not exercising your penis as much as even just having a regular boner.
If you jelq at 100% erection, and expand to 110%, then you're going beyond your normal limits, and if you do this consistently, your tunica albuginea should eventually gain the elasticity for your smooth muscle to push it to this point all on its own when you get an erection. Then your limit will be a bit higher, and you repeat the process until you hit your goal.
Erect jelqing is safe. Use a light grip and a slow stroke, that's all you need to create expansion, so don't worry about crushing your dick. What you're going for here is basically a manual simulation of pumping, so kegeling to push blood into your penis will help with the expansion too. If your erection drops down, edge until your reach 100% again.
I do not jelq for gains. I have no experience gaining from jelqing. But if I were to do it, that's how and why, and if you take issue with my reasoning, please address my points instead of my person. I could be a headless chicken, pecking away at my keyboard, and these points would still be valid so long as they stand to reason. Who says something is irrelevant, what they say is what matters.
What I'm looking for is an explanation as to how flaccid or semi-erect jelqing could possibly work. If you can explain the mechanism, and your explanation is consistent with anatomy and physics, then it'd be pretty hard to doubt your statements.
I think flaccid and semi-erect jelqing can be a great way to restore blood flow after other exercises, and I also think the EQ benefits can support gains.
But, if you're spending more than 10 minutes jelqing like that, and thinking it's going to make your penis bigger, I think you're wasting your time.
You're not going to get gains unless you expand your tissues beyond their normal capacity. If you jelq at 50% erection and expand it to 60%, you're still not exercising your penis as much as even just having a regular boner.
If you jelq at 100% erection, and expand to 110%, then you're going beyond your normal limits, and if you do this consistently, your tunica albuginea should eventually gain the elasticity for your smooth muscle to push it to this point all on its own when you get an erection. Then your limit will be a bit higher, and you repeat the process until you hit your goal.
Erect jelqing is safe. Use a light grip and a slow stroke, that's all you need to create expansion, so don't worry about crushing your dick. What you're going for here is basically a manual simulation of pumping, so kegeling to push blood into your penis will help with the expansion too. If your erection drops down, edge until your reach 100% again.
I do not jelq for gains. I have no experience gaining from jelqing. But if I were to do it, that's how and why, and if you take issue with my reasoning, please address my points instead of my person. I could be a headless chicken, pecking away at my keyboard, and these points would still be valid so long as they stand to reason. Who says something is irrelevant, what they say is what matters.
Comment