Need help on decreasing.

[CUSP82]

Ok kids I've had some rum, fell out of bed and woke up to visit here, and I really hope we're all playing nice. Hey what's your favorite color jelly bean????????????

[burtybasset]

Ok kids I've had some rum, fell out of bed and woke up to visit here, and I really hope we're all playing nice. Hey what's your favorite color jelly bean????????????

Grey!

[turtler]

Your sarcasm is noted, but you failed to read the thread, because on the 3rd page I said exactly why I was looking to reduce girth. To quote that post: "The reason for the reduction is more for me than the woman. It takes a while for me to achieve orgasm, which I attribute to lack of stimulation of the head because the shaft is so thick."

Uhmm, how is that supposed to work? Why would reducing the girth of the shaft enhance sensitivity in the glans? Please educate me, because I don't see how any of this follows.

Also, what other methods of acquiring more sensitivity have you tried before considering surgery? Surely, all other possibilities must have been exhausted before considering such a drastic measure?

I do not see the irony of which you speak. I thought it looked shopped, but I was gently made aware by the kind moderators of this forum that your photo is indeed legit... So, now a new world has opened - after some browsing, it seems your girth is much more accommodatable than I'd imagined. Lots of people can take 9.25" (beginning from the glans) vaginally and anally, if anything, you should be looking to expand.

[burtybasset]

Uhmm, how is that supposed to work? Why would reducing the girth of the shaft enhance sensitivity in the glans? Please educate me, because I don't see how any of this follows.

Also, what other methods of acquiring more sensitivity have you tried before considering surgery? Surely, all other possibilities must have been exhausted before considering such a drastic measure?

I do not see the irony of which you speak. I thought it looked shopped, but I was gently made aware by the kind moderators of this forum that your photo is indeed legit... So, now a new world has opened - after some browsing, it seems your girth is much more accommodatable than I'd imagined. Lots of people can take 9.25" (beginning from the glans) vaginally and anally, if anything, you should be looking to expand.

I think it's because his CC's are bigger than his glans (like mine are), and instead of enlarging his glans (cuz he is large), it would be a better idea to reduce the size of the CC's to increase friction of glans during penetration, you follow?

[Bigfoot69]

Uhmm, how is that supposed to work? Why would reducing the girth of the shaft enhance sensitivity in the glans? Please educate me, because I don't see how any of this follows.I do not see the irony of which you speak. I thought it looked shopped, but I was gently made aware by the kind moderators of this forum that your photo is indeed legit... So, now a new world has opened - after some browsing, it seems your girth is much more accommodatable than I'd imagined. Lots of people can take 9.25" (beginning from the glans) vaginally and anally, if anything, you should be looking to expand.

This was also posted earlier. My theory is that because the shaft is much thicker, it stretches things out, causing there to be less contact with the head. I'm not shaped like that toy you linked. Frankly, having the head as the largest part instead of tapering towards the tip would definitely make entry harderm

[turtler]

I think it's because his CC's are bigger than his glans (like mine are), and instead of enlarging his glans (cuz he is large), it would be a better idea to reduce the size of the CC's to increase friction of glans during penetration, you follow?

It's logical in one sense, but sounds awfully theoretical to me. There are people with much less girth, receiving even less friction, and they're still able to shoot often and early... A CC reduction procedure would by necessity be a guinea pig operation, because it's extremely rare for anyone to ever want one - just about everything else sounds like a better idea - even inserting less of the package.

[turtler]

Frankly, having the head as the largest part instead of tapering towards the tip would definitely make entry harderm

Harder, yes, but apparently still very much feasible... Sounds like you're just picking up random office girls, but there are always places one can go where there are women with special qualities and interests...

[GoingForGold]

9.25" girth means there is something wrong with your penis. I believe it could be done with lubricant and patience, I've never had to use lube and I'm at 6.5" now but come on now 9.25" is redickulous I wouldn't even try to put that in a girl.

I missed the pics though, I wanna see the freak

BTW, The numbers put you at more than 8 standard deviations from average. 3 puts you at ~1/700 and 6 at one in 2 BILLION. 8 is unimaginable so there must be something wrong.

If you want to increase glans sensitivity, you are going to need to get more blood flowing to it which will make it bigger.

[AlpineNewt]

I think it's because his CC's are bigger than his glans (like mine are), and instead of enlarging his glans (cuz he is large), it would be a better idea to reduce the size of the CC's to increase friction of glans during penetration, you follow?

Makes sense if you think about it logically.

[bored]

To bigfoot69. Do you have a frenulum or any remnant of one? It should be a sensitive area on the underside of your dick right below the head. Anyway that entire area is probably the most sensitive part of the penis.

HOWEVER, if you lube it up too much I've found it can decrease the sensitivity of it and blur the sensations into nothing. Since you said you use lube all the time, I think that is creating less sensitivity as well. I know it doesn't sound like it, but I've found a tiny amount of lube around the head/frenulum area underneath the head is the most effective. A lot of lube can blur the feelings to me. The feelings become less skin on skin and more of a lube on skin feeling.