Results 1 to 10 of 15
- 06-18-2012 #1Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Posts
- 259
Another excellent article from the King.
Link below. Read it all, and the comments.
More Scientific Evidence That Chicks Dig Jerks « Chateau Heartiste
Are dangerous men more attractive men? - Barking up the wrong tree
A reader writes, “We’re getting close to definitive proof that (most) chicks dig jerks.”
Yes, we are.
"Single women had their brains scanned as they looked at photos of men. The pictures had been subtlely altered to make the men’s faces more or less masculine.
The more masculine faces won out in terms of attraction — but the areas of the brain that were activated indicated these faces were also ones the women found most threatening. [ed: http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/...?m=1129645325g ]
The group found a few interesting results. First, compared with the feminized faces, masculinized faces led to more activity in five specific brain areas: the left superior temporal gyrus, bilateral precentral gyrus, right posterior cingulate cortex, bilateral inferior parietal lobule, and bilateral anterior cingulate cortex. These areas have been implicated in face processing as well as the assessment of risk, suggesting that, consciously or not, masculinized faces are perceived as not only more attractive but also more dangerous. The effect was quite robust considering just how slightly the faces had been morphed."
"Let that sink in. Brain scans prove that women are attracted to threatening men. The female hamster has just been CAT-scanned, x-rayed and magnetically resonanced, and the wicked truth behind all the feelgood claptrap and feminist boilerplate is revealed for the world to gaze upon with eyes half-shut at the gruesome sight, repulsed and yet fascinated: Chicks dig jerks. Assholes. Douchebags. Dangerous motherfuckers.
But the chicks with options… the ones who can pick and choose from among many men… the IN-DEMAND ones… they love the dickish dick. I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again. I’ve never gotten more radical, more INSTANT, positive results when hitting on cute babes than when I deliberately amped up my asshole vibe. I mean, to the point of nearly insulting them. Eyes brightened and sparkled, legs uncrossed, fingertips danced all over my arms. And these were the upper class smart chicks with multiple degrees.If you *have* to choose between being a niceguy and a total dickwad when picking up high value women…ALWAYS err on the side of dickwad."
^^^That last sentence is the best advice you'll ever hear. They should put that shit in the bible.
- 06-18-2012 #2Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Posts
- 310
Lololololololololololololololololololololololololo lolololololo
lolololololololololololololololo
lolololololololololo
lolololololol
lolll
lolStarting size - 8/27/2011
BPEL - 6"
NBPEL - 5"
EG - 4.25"
Current size
BPEL - 6.2"
NBPEL - 5.5"
MEG - 4.75"
BEG - 4.8"
- 06-18-2012 #3Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 7,184
Note to self: If you're going to try and pick up a female hamster, act like a jerk.
- 06-18-2012 #4Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Posts
- 663
I guess us nice guys finish last?
- 06-18-2012 #5XitemeMGuest
Saying the "Brain scans prove that women are attracted to threatening men" is preemptive. What we can say with more certainty is that the areas of the female brain that responded to masculized faces are also implicated in risk processing. It's intresting to ask more questions based on those findings, but the brain is very complex and it's not so black and white. It is an interesting observation in brain activity but actually proves very little in my opinion.
- 06-18-2012 #6
Hahaha all of previous posts sum up my thoughts
PEGym Theme Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RH76tfDxm7Y
- 06-18-2012 #7
All this really proves to me is ..if have a hang up or a belief and if you over focus on it, and search hard enough you will find things to support and prop up your feeling and thinking. That is one of the downfall so the internet.
- 06-18-2012 #8XitemeMGuest
Yeah the observations in the article and by IWW I'm afraid were applied to a pre-existing belief system, which is not a scientific approach. To me the observations are not controversial. A strong male may be a potential ally, or may be an enemy or dangerous. Would be expected to see face processing/risk assessment. As to higher masculinity being more attractive, sounds reasonable enough. I'm sure they don't mean hursuit bear-like men or anything. Just like, strong jaws and broad shoulders type of thing. The attributes we're all aware of being seen as more attractive in our culture. The idea that masculinity is naturally aligned with being a jerk is also a sad point of view.
Last edited by XitemeM; 06-18-2012 at 11:24 PM.
- 06-18-2012 #9
The women who prefer "dickwad's" to decent, good guys I wouldn't want any part of because that tells me they have a low opinion of themselves, they don't feel they can get anything better and are settling.......which all points to self esteem issues.
It's a tough job being good looking and hung :-)
- 06-18-2012 #10
You are correct MBD that is something that trips me up.
Similar Threads
-
"no scientific evidence to show that penile lengthening exercises work"
By should've started sooner in forum Penis Enlargement ForumReplies: 57Last Post: 04-26-2012, 10:34 AM -
Who's better? Thin chicks or those BBW??
By Skitz in forum Relationship ForumReplies: 31Last Post: 10-03-2010, 04:14 PM -
Is there any scientific evidence that this works?
By mbsurfer in forum Beginner's ForumReplies: 11Last Post: 05-27-2010, 02:10 PM -
Social awkwardness with chicks
By Radiohead in forum Relationship ForumReplies: 18Last Post: 02-02-2010, 09:08 AM



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote

OK ZZ two things I missed out...
My Prostate Has Let Me Down